A quiet place to discuss matters spirtual and material. Knock on Fr. Dude's door and find a brother. If you like this place, then bring anoth. .. I gotta stop now.
11 October 2012
Back to school (sort of)
I am taking Modern and Contemporary American Poetry from the University of Pennsylvania. Wow! Professor Al Filreis has gathered a great team who are making things happen. Over 30,000 people from all over the world are participating in the course.
I am loving it. I am looking forward to taking other courses. Take a look at the offerings and stretch yourself. You just might learn something.
29 August 2012
Inspiration from the Congregation
27 June 2012
"You DO believe in God!"
After the meeting she comes up to me and says “You really do believe in God.” To which I replied “Well, I guess I do.” She says, “Some people were wondering.”
I was glad that my faith was revealed by my willingness to let the chosen process go without having to control it. I was also glad that many people understand that at some point we just have to trust.
My heart is also warmed to think that some of my parishioners might actually wonder if I believe in God. (Was she just being silly?) I think there was truth in her humor, and that maybe I have been real enough with some folks for them to see that I am not always 100% on the belief meter.
I do believe, or trust, or desire God- I feel less certain about how God works in the world, but I am holding out for a loving God that comes on a lot like the Jesus revealed in the Gospels. (Yes, I do trust that Jesus is indeed God!)
Thanks to Barbara for the reminder that I do believe, on a day when I wasn’t so sure. Of all things, I get that word from a discussion about our desire to control things. My heart and mind were stuck in that territory most of the day.
I definitely believe in God.
11 June 2012
The Need to Know
31 May 2012
Episcopal Church Housekeeping
(From the June 2012 Newsletter of St. James Episcopal Church, Knoxville, TN)
Despite my best intentions I often allow clutter to overtake my car and study. After a short time a stack of mail, books to read, and assorted cups and soda cans crowd any available space. Social scientists have actually studied the impact of clutter on our lives and suggest that a messy space affects our physical and emotional health. The health of institutions can also suffer from the clutter of their systems and ways of relating. The Episcopal Church has been challenged to look our clutter and to do something about it.
The General Convention of the Episcopal Church will gather July 5-12 for its triennial meeting. Many of you are aware that human sexuality will once again be a big topic at convention, and will be the one that the press is most likely to cover. The convention will consider a resolution to approve a rite for the blessing of same-gender relationships. This rite will be for ‘trial use,’ meaning that bishops will direct the usage of such rites in each diocese and there will be some mechanism of reporting on how the rite is used. All indications are that this resolution will pass the convention. This will also call on the community of St. James to consider how this will influence our life together. In a way, it is a kind of housekeeping. For some time St. James has been a community that welcomes and affirms gay and lesbian members. Some of those in committed relationships have asked for a blessing of their relationship. I am allowed to pray with those folks but we are not performing blessings in the church itself. As I have met with these couples I have been frustrated that we can’t name those relationships within the context of the larger community. To allow for a rite of blessing is a matter of housekeeping. We would be putting the naming and blessing of God present in relationship in its proper place rather than keeping it in the clutter off to the side.
Many dioceses have sent resolutions to General Convention which call for a reorganization of the Episcopal Church structures. These resolutions are in response to the realization that a great deal of our expense at the national level has gone to administrative costs rather than mission. Our structures have become cluttered with commissions that could stand to spend time and money better in order to pursue mission. This reorganization is not a new thing. We have been in a process of understanding how our national structure can help support mission at other levels. I am sure that this discussion will dominate the conversation at convention, and continue to be part of discussions around the Episcopal Church.
What does that have to do with us? Well, we are the Episcopal Church and we have some housekeeping to do. As a parish we are literally attending to some needs of our physical plant so that we can fix some problems and prevent bigger issues. As a community we tend to our own ministries, and we do need to look at how practice those ministries. Is the ministry serving a real need? Is it easy for people to join in the work of the ministry? We do have new folks joining us and our attendance is on the rise. At the same time our budget is smaller. We have cut expenses, and our giving is lower than in previous years. There are many great ideas for ministry in word and deed, but there is a low commitment to leading those things (“I can help, but I don’t want to be in charge.” is a statement heard in many organizations in our culture.) While such things might be sobering, it is also an opportunity to consider different ways of doing things. Much like on the national level, we have an opportunity to creatively shape programs that are nimble, and varied. I am reminded of the early disciples who moved from place to place spreading the Good News whatever way they could.
I also believe that we have an opportunity to take inventory on an individual level. How are we living our lives? Are we shaping our lives so that we are witnesses to the Good News of Jesus Christ? What is distracting us from connecting with others? What clutters up our lives and keeps us from trusting that the Spirit will give us what we need to be faithful witnesses? In the financial uncertainly that is sweeping the globe we also must ask how we live with money. Do we truly need all this stuff? Are we living with our money in a way that glorifies God? (I am preaching to myself here, and it hurts!)
I hope that this call to housekeeping can stir up some conversation. May our discussions be holy and faithful. May our actions be fruitful. I truly hope that no one issue will distract us from the call to serve others in God’s name. We do need to speak of and wrestle with important issues, but those must be addressed in the context of our life in Christ. Join in the tending of the house (literal, spiritual, and otherwise) that God has given us. God saw fit to set up house in human skin and wants to live in yours.
Peace,
John Mark
22 May 2012
Psalm Writing, Poetry, and the Soul
Look through the Psalms and find those phrases that might shape a personal psalm.
Suggestions include:
I waited patiently
You go before me
Bones grow weak
I cry aloud to God
Over the waters
Myself a sanctuary
Ancient doors
Like a bird to the mountains
Look at me and answer
Like the feet of a deer
In the morning
. . . and you can find your own. Let the familiar phrases shape in you a response to God. Let the power of images and words awake the soul.
Peace,
John Mark
05 May 2012
Pastors should be blogging
22 December 2011
John Mark Wiggers: 'It Is About Trust.” » Metro Pulse
'via Blog this'
01 September 2011
Spiritual But Not Religious? Don't Challenge Me
First of all, I am sure that the author of the piece didn't mean to dismiss these folks. If this pastor is anything like me and a few other ordained people I know, she is also letting fly some of the cynical frustration that bubbles under the collar. (I did say that I resonated with this, didn't I?) In fact, the piece makes us religious types laugh at the experience, and at ourselves. Laughing at ourselves or others is a good place to start when considering a more compassionate response.
My parishioner dug deep and came back with some pointed questions. She said:
I wonder what is your take on this? I thought the author blindly lumped the "spiritual but not religious" together without considering the variety of people who may utter this sentence. People, maybe, who have been wounded by a religious institution. It is also a zero-sum game she proposes: either the person is a cloud-gazing coward, or they are like her, bravely seeking God in humanity. Isn't it possible that they are both without being "religious"? Is this the only Christian response? One that compares and qualifies our spirituality to that of others?
With congregants like this, who needs a spiritual director? This is indeed not the only Christian response. A more pastoral response would take into account where the person was coming from and what their experience might be. Many of those categories are noted in the comment above. Religious groups have done a great deal of damage, and the message of a grand deity watching over us doesn't always pass as positive. Of course, pain and negativity aren't always good reasons to take an easier path.
Most religions worth anything are well aware of pain and suffering. We acknowledge, accept it, and respond to it. A spirituality of the sunset isn't invalid. I believe that we need more than this for true spiritual transformation. I have found the religious community to be a place where I can bring my sunset experiences as well as my wounds, doubts, and fears. I find the rituals and prayers of old that hold me accountable for seeing the beauty of life, and the reality of death. I find a community that challenges me and tolerates me. I am called to consider the wonder of God in nature, and to turn to my fellow humans with compassion.
So, to that person telling me they are "spiritual but not religious" I can offer a listening ear, and share my own journey of what religion has done to hold and shape my spirituality. I can also challenge my own community to be a place that welcomes the wounded without comparing their way to ours. We can realize that some folks just can't be involved in community in the same way as those of us who feel drawn to communion, or can't imagine not having burial rites within the church walls.
Today, I am thankful for a pastor who expressed in a humorous way what I often feel. I also give thanks for a parishioner who called me beyond a chuckle. I will take all of us this with me when I pray using forms passed to me through religious tradition. As I look to the sunset I will hold in those prayers all who find spirituality outside religious forms.
12 May 2011
One Sojourner's Journey of Believing Out Loud
I take the issue of including LGBTQ people in the church personally because I am the rector of a congregation that has been welcoming for some time. Last year, an older member of my congregation approached me about St. James signing on to be a Believe Out Loud congregation. We presented the information to our vestry, formed a committee, and had an open meeting with the congregation. Believe Out Loud asks congregations to make and publish a statement that explicitly welcomes people. The committee had a statement that they presented to those gathered. Most people were supportive and shared stories of their relationships and experience. A few expressed that the lifestyles affirmed were just wrong, and the church should not be endorsing them. Others were concerned that the statement wasn’t inclusive enough. At the end of the evening those gathered referred the decision to the vestry.
At the next vestry meeting our affiliation with Believe Out Loud was approved along with the following statement:
St. James Church welcomes all people. We believe that God's grace embraces and dwells in everyone. We welcome all people to ministry and worship regardless of race, ethnicity, creed, class, age, gender, marital status, physical or mental ability, sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. All are welcome.
We subsequently began to publish the statement on our bulletin, newsletter, and website. We also linked to the Believe Out Loud website. The response was almost immediate. People started calling me, and visiting the Church because they felt welcomed. A few months after this process a parishioner did come talk to me as they were distressed about the statement and thinking of leaving the congregation that they had been part of for many years. “Why are we doing this?” they asked. “We are already welcoming. They are already accepted here. Why do we need to say this?” Great question, so why are we saying this?
I believe that the driving force behind the congregation of St. James making this statement is relationship. At our congregational meeting, many people shared stories of being gay and finding acceptance here, of their children and grandchildren, and of their experience of knowing faithful gay and lesbian people who reflect the love of God in their lives. Many of us have known the witness of long-lasting loving relationships that in no way could fit the description of “vile affections” as described in Romans 1. It has “seemed good to us and the Holy Spirit” to honor and welcome these people into our congregations. Many, myself included, feel that we should be naming God’s blessing on these relationships as well.
It has been through relationships that I came to accept homosexuality- no, that is not right- to accept people of all kinds. I was not convinced by “the gay agenda.” My relationships have caused me to look again at scripture, our culture, and my faith traditions. In those things I see that relationships are what change people. Knowledge of God might lead us to relationship, but it is not the relationship itself. In fact, relationships of any kind are mysterious. We can’t know everything about the other (or even ourselves). Indeed, my theology is very much influenced by the subjective, and the felt. I admit that, and know that subjective arguments will not satisfy many people.
In my daily life I am convinced completely by relationship. It is the relationships of people at St. James that caused us to make an explicit statement welcoming all people. Of course some say that no statement is needed as we are already welcoming. Some say that the statement excludes those it doesn’t mention. To that I say that we (at least our particular community) do not make this statement for ourselves, we make it for our relationship to the world. There are people who have no idea that there is a place where they can be welcomed to worship God and be a follower of Christ. Issues of sexuality are at the forefront of cultural argument and attention, so we hold that up now. Maybe we won’t need this statement some day. We have made this statement out of the particular experiences of relationship and how they have changed us. We make this statement in order to call people into relationship with God.
I am trying to honor those who disagree with me, and I am grateful that some who don’t agree with the St. James Believe Out Loud statement have continued to worship and minister with us. I am finding that my relationships are pushing toward my coming out more openly as a supporter of LGBTQ people. So I start today with these words on a blog that is read by only a few people I am in relationship with. May relationships continue to transform us. May relationship with God be declared as open to all.
04 May 2011
So Much to Say
O God, the Father of all, whose Son commanded us to love
our enemies: Lead them and us from prejudice to truth:
deliver them and us from hatred, cruelty, and revenge; and in
your good time enable us all to stand reconciled before you,
through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen. (BCP 816)
|
09 March 2011
Technology and Lent
24 June 2010
Summer Camp is an Alternate Universe
24 May 2010
I got witnessed to!

On a recent Sunday afternoon I joined some friends and family at her restaurant for lunch. There was a long wait for tables and we decided to wait outside. Being Sunday we had just come to church, and I was stressed out in my clericals. A woman approached me and asked what church I was from. I told her St. James on Broadway, an Episcopal church. She says that she is always curious about what different churches believe. "what does your church believe about salvation?" I gave my standard short answer, that the church, and I also believe that salvation is up to God. We believe that it is God's grace that saves us. She nodded and asked how it is that one is saved. Well, we accept Christ. At some point I mentioned baptism, at which point she interrupts, "So you have to do something?" From that point on, the conversation was hers. She told me how she raised Roman Catholic, and never been taught that salvation was by God's grace. She told me that she'd asked a priest once how she could be forgiven and lamented that the priest did not show her in Scripture that it is God who can forgive and take away her sins. She went on to tell me that she had been living a wealthy life, but had been terribly unhappy. One day, a born-again woman (her description) told her of God's saving grace that it is through faith and that we are saved not by works. She responded and received Christ. She related that a year later her husband to have committed his life to Christ and that now they were preparing to go to a reservation to be missionaries. She gave me a couple of tracts detailing the way to salvation.
I nodded, smiled, and thanked her. My sense was that we both agreed that it is by God's grace we are saved. It was also my sense that she would not agree that we were in agreement. Some of those with me were disturbed. The prevailing complaint was that it seemed to them that the woman felt so sure that she was right that I was wrong. I wasn't really frustrated by the encounter. She was being authentic to who she was. I can definitely say that I've been mulling over this business of grace, works, and salvation. She got me thinking.
It is quite confusing thing, and it's not a new argument. For the first several hundred years of Christianity most of the arguments were about the nature of Christ. The battles regarding the nature of salvation came later. Rightfully, they came in resistance to corrupt systems in which the institution of the church controlled, who was in and who was out. I am personally familiar with this debate as I grew up believing that those Roman Catholics were going to hell because they believed that we were saved by being good people. I was taught a "grace, but" theology. We are saved by God's grace, but we had better believe certain things if we are truly saved.
These days I cling to belief that God is truly in charge of salvation. The sacraments, good works, and even saying a prayer to receive Christ are works that do not accomplish salvation. They are tools that open us to trusting that transforming grace of God. I know that I have to throw myself on these means of grace because these are things that remind me of that grace.
Maybe I will continue some discussion of grace and salvation. For now, I will say that I am believing that it is God's unmerited favor towards us that brings us healing. Even if I am wrong about that, I believe that God can forgive my error. Grace is just that powerful.
I am thankful that I got witnessed to, and I pray that this woman too can cling to the grace God has given us. I hope that she might have some realization that a long-haired guy in a clerical collar also holds to that grace, trusting completely in God to save us all.
15 April 2010
National Day of Prayer Hooplah!
21 December 2009
St. Thomas Didymus
In the hot street at noon I saw him
a small man
gray but vivid, standing forth
beyond the crowd's buzzing
holding in desperate grip his shaking
teethgnashing son,
and thought him my brother.
I heard him cry out, weeping and speak
those words,
Lord, I believe, help thou
mine unbelief,
and knew him
my twin:
a man whose entire being
had knotted itself
into the one tightdrawn question,
Why,
why has this child lost his childhood in suffering,
why is this child who will soon be a man
tormented, torn, twisted?
Why is he cruelly punished
who has done nothing except be born?
The twin of my birth
was not so close
as that man I heard
say what my heart
sighed with each beat, my breath silently
cried in and out,
in and out.
After the healing,
he, with his wondering
newly peaceful boy, receded;
no one
dwells on the gratitude, the astonished joy,
the swift
acceptance and forgetting.
I did not follow
to see their changed lives.
What I retained
was the flash of kinship.
Despite
all that I witnessed,
his question remained
my question, throbbed like a stealthy cancer,
known
only to doctor and patient. To others
I seemed well enough.
So it was
that after Golgotha
my spirit in secret
lurched in the same convulsed writhings
that tore that child
before he was healed.
And after the empty tomb
when they told me that He lived, had spoken to Magdalen,
told me
that though He had passed through the door like a ghost
He had breathed on them
the breath of a living man --
even then
when hope tried with a flutter of wings
to lift me --
still, alone with myself,
my heavy cry was the same: Lord
I believe,
help thou mine unbelief.
I needed
blood to tell me the truth,
the touch
of blood. Even
my sight of the dark crust of it
round the nailholes
didn't thrust its meaning all the way through
to that manifold knot in me
that willed to possess all knowledge,
refusing to loosen
unless that insistence won
the battle I fought with life
But when my hand
led by His hand's firm clasp
entered the unhealed wound,
my fingers encountering
rib-bone and pulsing heat,
what I felt was not
scalding pain, shame for my
obstinate need,
but light, light streaming
into me, over me, filling the room
as I had lived till then
in a cold cave, and now
coming forth for the first time,
the knot that bound me unravelling,
I witnessed
all things quicken to color, to form,
my question
not answered but given
its part
in a vast unfolding design lit
by a risen sun.
The Stream & the Sapphire: Selected Poems on Religious Themes (New Directions Paperbook) by Denise Levertov
02 November 2009
Why can't those _______ just go away? And why isn't my priest speaking up about ____________?
07 October 2009
Getting Back to My Dudeness

I may have made a mistake in being so public with my congregation with regard to my love for the film "The Big Lebowski". One 80 year old parishioner reported that in preparation for my arrival she watched the film. After getting past the frequent f-bombs she noted that it was funny, and brought matters around to a place of redemption. So my revelation has made some connection with her, and with others. It was at a previous parish that someone gave me the moniker "Father Dude" due to my appreciation of the film, my physical likeness, and I would like to think because of my way of abiding.
08 September 2009
New Be-ginnings
15 June 2009
Evelyn Underhill Quotes
Evelyn Underhill"